![]() Workflow is usually something like:Īssemble, edit and produce all of the footage (say 1 hr doco format for example) Assemble and prepare all of the audio tracks, including voice-over, wild camera sound, SFX, music temp etc. round tripping, this is precisely what I do with all of my projects, between Resolve Studio 16 and Nuendo 10. Fairlight offers far more in terms of audio production than any other NLE available in my view most are toys. Resolve includes a sophisticated (though a little non-standard) DAW in its Fairlight page following the purchase of that company a few years ago. If for TV or pro film industry, there are a zillion options there - and this is Resolve’s background setting /expectation. No, it does not include DVD burning, that is a far rarer consumer format these days otherwise, it would be more usual to (say) make an Mp4 and distribute that via cloud, stick, whichever. Much of this thread seems to relate to Resolve’s Delivery page (export) and that indeed has many, many options including to FCPX, Pro Tools, AAF, H264, YouTube, masering formats like Atom, etc. I’ve have also worked with Adobe Premier & Final Cut Pro X over many years as well. ![]() ![]() It is certainly a very mature package now, not perfect by any means, though no packages are & certainly in the realm of NLEs. I’ve been using DaVinci Resolve Studio consistently since v12, have been through the beta testing cycles of v14, 15 & 16 with Blackmagic now on the current version 16.1.1. Wondering if anyone uses DaVinci Resolve 16 for video editing, and your opinion on the suite. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |